The White Mans Burden, Rudyard Kipling | Analysis

The unobjectionable Mans he artistic creation and soul, Rudyard Kipling AnalysisI aim to assess the substance ab recitation of ridicule and symbol in the poems The tweed Mans Burden and the hearty ovalbumin Mans Burden to see how effective some(prenominal) writers were in employ these elements to convey meanings. In the case of Kipling, I leave consider dickens points of celestial horizons. The first point of catch up with is that Kipling was an imperialist who supports the take oer of early(a) g e trulywherenments to essay superiority. The second point of hang out is that Kipling was an imperialist who supports the take over of other governments as an act of hu valetity to do work refinement to the vicious and, that he warns of the perils of showe superiority as oppose to bringing neat liberation. In the case of Crosby, since he presents a single guess point, I pass on evaluate his force of using derision and symbolism in parodying the course of Kipling. Effectively employ, pressy and symbol could convey a nitty-gritty with more than one meaning as demonstrate in Rudyard Kiplings poem The White Mans Burden or, they could convey a single message demonstrated in Ernest H. Crosbys poem The Real White Mans Burden. In the final analysis, I submit that the effective practice of the elements of poetry, in this case, raillery and symbol, atomic number 18 critical to the correct exposition and understanding of the meaning of both poems.In ramble to establish a well-rounded understanding of the basis for the two interpretations of Kiplings work and the single interpretation of the work of Crosby, I submit definitions for the destinations imperialism, irony, and symbol. These definitions will as well as serve to show whether or non at that place was effectiveness in the use of the elements of poetry, in both poems. As defined by Dictionary.ComImperialism is the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or commonwea lth over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies. Irony is the random variable between what is said, done, expected or intended, and what is meant, what happens, and what others understand. Satirical irony is the exposure of the vices or follies of an individual, a group, an institution, an idea, a society, usually with a view to correct the folly. symbolisation is anything that stands for something else. (Dictionary.Com)Having establishing the definitions, I will now analyze the use of irony and symbols in Ruyard Kiplings poem. charm Kipling uses both irony and symbols, his use of irony is greater. Kiplings expertly uses irony to bring well-nigh the intended end result of two argue perspectives as to whether imperialism is for human good or elitist gain.In the first view point, Kipling uses the poem The White Mans Burden to bring forward America to take over the Phillipines imperialistically or, for elitist gain. Kipling writesTake up the White mans weight / channel forth the trump ye breed / Go bind your sons in exile / To serve your captives pick up (1-4)The first observation of the poem is Kiplings decision to call the poem The White Mans Burden. Undoubtedly, the use of the phrase White Man is the lightening rod that sparks the view that Kiplings emplacement was that of an imperialist having at its core the tenets of Social Darwinism. According to Kretchner, the imagination of Social Darwinism purports that natural order obligates powerful, civilized nations to appropriate the extra resources of the weak. (Kretchmar) Hence, Kiplings spurring of America to assist the Phillipines to reach purification may be interpret as him supporting the imperialistic movement.Even further, Kiplings encouragement that the empire should transport forth the best ye breed has very strong racial connotations. During that conviction in history, blacks were not considered as equals to whites in America. The unequal interposition of blacks was so prevalent in Americas frugal, political, and social systems that James Weldon Johnson, writes Lift Every fathom and Sing too known as the Black National Anthem, to encourage black people to sing and march until victory is won. This password for compare continues in 1968, with Martin Luther King still lone(prenominal) having a dream of equality. Though, in 2008, Barrack Obama blend ins the first black President, there still remains the cry for true equality.In extension to the charges to Take up White Mans burden / Send forth the best ye breed(1-2), Kiplings use of phrases such as To confuse the threat of terror / And check the show of pride. (11-12) asserts that the empire must do what is infallible to eliminate resi emplacement and to subdue insurrections against Imperialism. Not only should the conglomerate silence the voices of the captives, just now she must also limit or eat up any signs of pride that they might muster.Further, Kiplings characteri zations of the people as On fluttered ethnic music and wild / New caught- sullen peoples, / Half-devil and half-child. (6-8) may be intimately construed as connatively condescending. Kipling come outs to imply that the empire must be prepared to reinforce her stance By open speech and simple / A hundred propagation shed plain (13-14). Kiplings distinction of the empire seem to be gilded in its tone. By marrying the symbols of the captives as creation inferior people to the santimonious certificate of indebtedness of the Empire to bring civility to the uncivilized, one en miscellanyle conclude that Kipling supports that the Empire is superior and hence has the responsibility to bring civility to the uncivilized.Ironically, the same consistency of work that interpretively champions the Empire as cosmos superior to the captives, implores the empire to be fair and complete in its liberation of the captives. The second point of view to the work of Kipling in the The White Mans Burden is 4that he advocates for the fair treatment of the captives. Kiplings urging of the empire to liberate the captives and to take care of their needs can be found byout his poem. According to Bonamy Dobree, while speaking to Canadians in 1907, Kipling saidI have, I confess it now, done my best for about twenty years to make all men ofthe sister nations deep down the Empire interested in each other. Because I know that at heart all our men are pretty much alike, in that they have the same aspirations,and when all is said and done we have only each other to depend upon. (Dobree 80)Kipling demonstrates a view consistent to those who conceive that true liberation is not oppressive. For example, he writesTake up the White Mans burden / The savage wars of peace- / Fill full the mouth of Famine / And machinate the sickness cease (17-20)Further, Kipling warns the Empire that all of its actions or inactions, all that it range or not say will help to determine how the captives vie w the Empire and its God. Here is what Kipling saysBy all ye cry or whisper, / By all ye leave or do, / The silent, sullen peoples / Shall weigh your gods and you. (45-48)In addition to how the captives view the Empire and its God, Kipling writes that other countries and future generations will also look at the treatment of the captives and judge the Empire. Kipling goes on to tell the empire not to celebrate its victory or relish in the praise, since these acts are childish, but that the Empire should be more concern with how the work would be judged by the Empires peers for years to come.To encapsulate the view that Kipling wanted the Empire to bring civilization without present superiority, his closing verse from the poem is submitted. Kipling writesTake up the White Mans burden / Have done with childish days / The lightly favorite(a) laurel, / The easy, ungrudged praise. / Comes now, to search your manhood / Through all the thankless years / Cold. knifelike with dear-bought w isdom, / The judgment of your peers (49-56)These language clearly indicate that Kipling encourage the Empire to be honorable in its dealings with the Natives.Contrary to the school of thought that Kipling advocates civilization with true liberation, is Crosbys position that the Empire uses blessings as a doorway to go in and take away the true riches of the people and in exchange gives them an oppressive life style. Unlike Kiplings rendering of his poem, The White Mans Burden where he shows his trust for the Empire, Crosby in his parody The Real White Mans Burden, blatantly shows his mistrust of the Empire. Most importantly, though he employs heavy use of irony and symbols to demonstrate his opposing view of the Empire, Crosby does not dillute the single message of his poem.First, Crosbys name of the poem is a clear indicator of his dissent from Kiplings views. He uses the term White Man to solidify the object of his remarks, but, he goes further by using the word Real which ironi cally implies that there is a book binding of the truth. Crosbys title speaks strongly of his judgment against the Empire. Historically, his point of view is drawn from his experiences as a social activist and as a black man living in America at the time of the Spanish American War. According to an essay by Andrew Hebard, Crosbys position on Imperialism mirrors that of Amy Kaplan who says imperialism is as a network of power relations that changes over space and time and is pierce with instability, ambiguity, and disorder, rather than as a monolithic system of domination that the very word empire implies. (Hebard)Next, are observations of the blending of symbol and irony used by Crosby to demonstrate his view of the Empire. Crosby believes that the motive of the Empire is ill-willed. He also believes that their chaiotic sytems bring failure, and the Empire dangle proverbial carrots in exchange for outlying(prenominal) more valuable gains. Crosbys position is that the eventual out come of imperialism will be social, economical, and political oppression.At this time, a detailed look at Crosbys use of irony and symbols to depict the social climate that prevailed in America, the climate which he opposed to being introduced to the Natives, is warranted. Crosby assertsTake up the White Mans burden / Send forth your sturdy sons, / And load them down with whisky / And Testaments and guns. (1-4)Ironically, these lines subliminally say that the inebriety of whiskey mask the truth, since it is widely known that people who consume similarly much alcohol are not as cognitively certain as they should be and, therefore, not able to think correctly are apt to believe anything told to them. Further, being lo fruit drinkd down with whiskey causes a usually sturdy psyche to stagger, and even fall. More overtly though, is the situation that Testament represents truth and wholesomeness, and guns represent power and destruction. But, because the minds are altered with alcoho l, the coating of the real motive is easily perpetrated. There is a strong theory that the soldiers will introduce the social ill of alcoholism to the natives, and will also help to spread propoganda about the good of imperialisim thereby causing the natives to become drunk and misinformed. The abililty of the natives to think reasonably correct about their condition will be diminished.To further support his view of social failure and to show that the Empire thinks that the Natives have limited information and can be easily captured if not military, certainly they can be captured through the spread of socially communicable diseases. Crosby writesThrow in a few diseases / to spread in tropic climes, / For there the healthy niggers / Are quite behind the times. (5-8)Crosby bolsters his position of social oppression by sayingGive them electrocution chairs, / And prisons too, galore, / And if they seeminclined to kick, / Then spill their heathen gore. (21-24)The symbols of electrocuti on chairs, prisons, and gore ironically speaks of death both physically and mentally. Physically speaking, there is the death of the person whether by electrocution, or the spilling of the blood. Then, there is death of having freedom of space, since prisons limit movement. While subtle, based on Crosbys account, the intention to kill the dreams of the natives, screams from the pages of history. Crosby knows from his experience, that if any form of resistance, whether through word or action, is shown, if any attempt to pursue any dreams, ideologies, or customs that threatens the goals of the Empire is made, that the Empire would by any means necessary, construe that the pursuit of those dreams was deferred and dry up like A Raisins in the Sun. (Diyanni 1870 )In addition to social oppression, Crosby purports that the Natives will be opressed economically through ticklish labor as well as through the Empires system of revenue enhancement and debt. The view point of oppresive labor is aptly projected through the use of irony. Crosby claimsAnd dont forget the factories. / on those benighted shores / They have no cheerful iron mills / Nor eke departmemnt stores / They never work twelve hours a day, / And live in strange content. (9-14)Through his masterful use of irony, Crosby argues that the natives, who did not work as long hours as did the Americans, were very content with what little they thought they had. However, the big issue for Crosby appears to be that Empire knew that the natives were actually very successful and fuddled and sought to make them believe that their way of life was inadequate, and to turn them from being owners of the land to laborers in the land so that the Empire may be expanded. (A perfect combination of imperialism and colonialism) Even more indicative of his stance against economic oppression, Crosby decried the imposing of taxation and debt. He writesTake up the White Mans burden, / And larn the Phillipines / What interest and t axes are / and what a mortgage means. (17-20)Again, in Crosbys minds eye, there is the irony of a people who are successful in their simple but, fissiparous way of life who being militarily inferior are accordingly forced to become failures by their dependence on a infatuated financial system.In a final attempt to show the phantasm of the Empire, Crosby highlights the political climate that the Empire embraces. He pensThey need our labor question, too, / And governing and fraud. / Weve made a pretty mess at home / Lets make a mess abroad. (25 -28)The irony in these lines humorously evaluate the movement of the Empire to fix anothers problem, when it cannot solve its own problems. In a nutshell, Crosby believes that Imperialism is a preposterous veiled attempt to cloak esurience in kind deeds by using methods that are disfunctional.In summarizing his single message of the failure and hypocrisy of the Empire, Crosby does three things. First he mocks what the Empire regards as a valiant mission, Next, he shows the unparrarel trade that the Empire wants, and then, he addresses the faade of the scripting of the mission that the Empire prefer to be written in the annals of history. The use of satirical irony and symbols are well armoured vehicles to feature these points. Crosby declaresTake up the White Mans burden / to you who thus succeed / In civilizing savage hordes / They owe a debt, indeed (33 -36)Crosby questions the validity of the mission. He goes on to weigh the exchange between the Empire and the Natives. He addsConcessions, pensions, salaries, / And priviledge and right, / with outstretched manpower you raised to bless / Grab everything in sight. (37 -40).In terms of irony, not only is there a contrast between how much is attached verses how much is taken, but, also of what is given verses what is taken. The natives receive a few limited handouts like agreements, benefits, and paychecks and, in exchange the Empire takes ownership of the native s land and naturual resources. Interpretively, Crosby demostrates this performance as a falling leap by going from owning to owing which is very much an uneven trade. Finally, he attacks the hypocrisy of using the art of writing to distort the issue and hide the true motive of the Empire. It is necessary to present the catalog of words Crosby uses to expose what he views as being socially, economically, and politically incorrect . Crosby concludesTake up the White Mans burden, / And if your write in verse, / Flatter your Nations vices, / And strive to make them worse. / Then learn that if with pious words / you ornament each phrase, / In a world of canting hypocrites / This kind of channel pays. (41 48)Fittingly, Crosby uses satirical irony to reveal the true motive of the insincere enthusiam that Crosby believes Kipling is showing for the Empires high ideals of pious goodness. Crosby is successful in presenting the single viewpoint of the Empires greed disguised as bringing civi lity to the uncivilized.In conclusion, the expert use of irony and symbol by both Kipling and Crosby prove to be gauzy conveyors of the poets messages. Kiplings use of irony and symbol brillantly give uped two very contradictory positions. He lauds Imperialism by advocating that it is the responsibility of civilized nations to help to bring civilization to underdeveloped nations. He also decries the pride of thinking to be superior and being unfair to people perceived to be less finanically fortunate, not as socially advanced, and not as politically savvy. Like Kipling, Crosby employs irony and symbols to deliver his solo message. Crosbys message is that the Empire is hypocrital in its motive and that the gist of what they genuinely wanted to do was camoflagued by missions to humanity, and described as helping to bring civilization to the uncivilized. Clearly, the poets use of irony and symbol shaped the understanding and interpretation of the poems intended meanings. The use of Irony and Symbol was so well executed, there remains no argument as to the value of these elements in both poems.