Immediate Dentin Sealing Of Crown Health And Social Care Essay

neighboring(a) dentin sealing Of Crown health And Social C be searchBackground Dental meridians are persuasionl counter to foster dentition that stick egress been extremely worn down, broken, weakened by tooth decay, and heavily fill or base fireal enured. They outhouse be overly utilise for aesthetic purposes. Full upper side expression requires more tooth remotion than former(a) restorations and is associated with dentin exposure. When a twain-stage baksheesh fabrication is planned, there is a chance of bacterial contamination of the pulpal tissue paper through dentine and eventually muscularity injustice. The main objective of this protocol is to assess whether immediate close of the unfastened dentine muster fol upseting pinnacle planning of back dentition can lead to a decline in microleakage and bacterial percolation from the oral environment.Methods This protocol, immediate dentine seal off of diadem preparations, demonstrates a sham for a iodine division, three age and six years follow-up, in-vivo, randomised visitled psychometric test with a balanced interposition apportioning of 11 (immediate dentine sealing vs. delayed sealing). The let up toment volition include tooth preparation, printing victorious, temporary crown placement and unspoilt crown fit on a posterior tooth.Discussion The resultant roles of the theater of operations would provide insight into the suspense of whether immediate sealing of dentine after crown preparation cut backs the bacterial ingression and incidence of racyity blemish of odontiasising. The results would also help to provide recount ground suggestions for clinicians and new(prenominal) seekers.OverviewThis talk consists of literature review and a original of the use up digit and methodology, followed by data management, statistical analysis and bore assurance of proposed flying field. Other constituents are allocated to ethical consideration a nd reflection on thesis procedure.DECLARATIONNo portion of the work referred to in the dissertation has been submitted in support of an application for another degree or susceptibility of this or any(prenominal)(prenominal) other university or other institute of learning. knowing PROPERTY STATEMENTThe author of this dissertation (including any appendices and/or schedules to this dissertation) owns trusted copyright or related rights in it (the Copyright) and s/he has effrontery The University of Manchester certain rights to use such Copyright, including for administrative purposes.Copies of this dissertation, both in full or in extracts and whether in hard or electronic copy, whitethorn be made only in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended) and regulations issued downstairs it or, where appropriate, in accordance with licensing agreements which the University has entered into. This page must form part of any such copies made.The ownership of certain Copyright, patents, designs, trade marks and other beneathstanding property (the Intellectual Property) and any reproductions of copyright works in the dissertation, for good example graphs and tables (Reproductions), which whitethorn be described in this dissertation, may not be owned by the author and may be owned by third parties. Such Intellectual Property and Reproductions cannot and must not be made available for use without the front written permission of the owner(s) of the relevant Intellectual Property and/or Reproductions.Further information on the conditions under which disclosure, publication and commercialisation of this dissertation, the Copyright and any Intellectual Property and/or Reproductions described in it may take place is available in the University IP Policy (see http//documents.manchester.ac.uk/display.aspx?DocID=487), in any relevant Dissertation labor declarations deposited in the University Library, The University Librarys regulations (see http//www.manchester.ac.uk/library/aboutus/regulations) and in The Universitys Guidance for the Pre moveation of Dissertations.AcknowledgementsI befuddle great pleasure to express my gratitude to my Tutor(Juliette Kendall). She has been most helpful and ancillary throughout.Introduction, Research question and PICO1.1 IntroductionRestoring teeth with full-c everywhereage crowns is a routine treatment in general alveolar coiffe. This normally requires 2 visits, one for crown preparation and impression taking and one for net cementation of the crown erst the restoration has been produced in the dental research lab. Provisional crowns which bequeath be provided to protect the tooth betwixt two visits could cause problems since they are not bail bonded to the prompt tooth surface permanently and require removal prior to final cementation. Problems may bump if the bacteria from oral stone pit gain access to the pulpal tissue. The consequence could be pulp inflammation or ev en irreversible pulp infection, which requires endodontic treatment. There are some certify in the literature that suggests that applying a sealant material on the fresh prompt teeth may reduce the invasion of the pulp by bacteria (Magne et al., 2007). Any run compulsions to be made to reduce the stake of full of lifeity loss in teeth requiring a full- insurance coverage crown.There are other alternatives to reduce the bacterial ingression like CAD/CAM technology. This method allows restoring a tooth with a crown in a single visit. Reis 2006 believes that using this corpse may decrease the possibility of bacterial infection of the pulp as there is no need for provisional coverage of the prepared tooth.1.2 Research questionprotect the open dentine with a sealant after a crown preparation requires some surplus pure tones and is more expense and long than the traditional procedure. The research question is if it is clinically indispensable to seal the exposed dentine immed iately after the preparation with a dentine sealing agent or not.1.3 PICOPopulation NHS and private unhurrieds between the age of 18 and 58 years of age in general dental practice requiring full-coverage crowns of a posterior tooth.Intervention Sealing the exposed dentine of prepared teeth for full crown coverage with a dentine sealing agent instantly after the preparation sooner taking a final impression and temporisation. manipulate Not sealing the exposed dentine of prepared teeth for full crown coverage with a dentine sealing agent instantly after the preparation.Outcome measure canvass the vitality loss of the prepared teeth for full crown restoration at one year, three years and six years.Aims and objectivesAimsThe find of the study is to evaluate the efficiency of instant sealing of posterior teeth prepared for full crown coverage prior to impression taking and temporisation in basis of vitality loss compared with teeth without any sealant application.ObjectivesThe dire ct objective is to assess whether an instant sealing of prepared posterior teeth for full crown restorations with a dentine sealant results in a reduction in vitality loss.To organise a clinical struggle and to allocate two assorts of participants (NHS and private) aged between 18 and 58 requiring a crown on a posterior tooth. One collection depart micturate their prepared teeth covered and one group not.To disassemble the achieved data and to determine whether there is a difference between groups in terms of loss of vitality.Literature review3.1 IntroductionThe assumption of this protocol is the proposition that the instantaneous sealing of exposed dentine after crown preparation, leave behind help against the bacterial contamination of the pulpal tissue and decreases the probability of the tough tooth requiring cornerstone canal treatment in the future.3.2 Search StrategyThe strategy conducted for this literature review included an electronic search of the following dat abases EMBASE (1995 Oct 2011), MEDLINE (1995 Oct 2011) and Cochrane Library. The extension phone list includes hand-searched articles and key journals related to researching.Key words REFER TO reveal WORD EITHER HERE OR APPENIX3.3 BackgroundWhere tooth destruction by dental disease is extensive, restoration may only be doable with full coverage restorations or crowns. There is a big function of NHS and private patients in UK requiring a full coverage of posterior teeth imputable to failed huge previous(prenominal) restorations, fractured cusps or following a fall canal therapy. Tooth preparation for full coverage crown requires more tooth removal than other restorations. It should be carried out in a conservative way. The former is to reduce the post-preparation sensitivity and pulp tissue bulwark in vital teeth and to maximise the remaining tooth structure.3.4 Crown Preparation and pulpHealth of pulp tissue can be modify by any restorative treatment. This is due to a con tinuous extension between dentinal and pulpal fluent (Pashley 1992).Preparation for a full-coverage restoration requires removal of most of the enamel resulting in an exposed dentine surface and may affect the pulp. In one study by Jackson et al. (1992) irreversible pulpitis transcendred in5.7% of cases in which crowns were placed. The bigger the exposed dentine surfaces during tooth preparation like for a crown, the greater the risk of bacterial infiltration from the oral environment (Pashley, 1990).Saunders and Saunders (1998) considered the vitality loss in adults who received full crowns in a dental hospital establish on radiographic analysis and found that 19% of the patients in the study have lost vitality of the prepared teeth.A study by Cheung et al. (2005) aimed to investigate the influence of factors connected with pulpal damage in teeth restored with porcelain amalgamate to metal (PFM) crowns or crowned as a fixed duet abutment. The study reveals that the preparation for either of the restorations requires a considerable reduction of dentine and may cause trauma to pulp tissue but the prize rate of pulp in single-unit crowns is higher than in abutment teeth.Bergenholtz and Nyman (1984) and Karlsson (1986) demonstrated a permanent pulpal damage rate of 1% year for vital teeth following a crown restoration.3.5 Crown Vs. other restorationsMany previous studies have supported the use of substantiating intracoronal restorations (porcelain or composite) in vital teeth as advantageous against full-coverage restorations due to their less invasively preparation and more conservative reputation (Jackson, 2008, Magne et al., 1996, Dietschi et al., 1994). They have been also considered to be easier to do than a crown and are no more expensive than crowns or root canal treatments.A literature review by Kerschbaum and Vo 1981 showed that inlay restorations at 10 years have 9.5% lower rate of vitality loss compared to full crown restorations. When aestheti c aspect is not the first antecedency properly designed and provided inlays and onlays have the same longevity and durability as crowns (Jackson, 2008).Cusp replacement with rosin composite can be considered as alternative to traditional cusp replacement by crowns due to advanced(a) cohesive technology. Deliperi et al. (2006) high shed lessen on that if the hold fast agent is not stressed, an acceptable victor rate could be achieved by using this method. According to van Dijken et al. (2001) an indirect cusp replacement restoration with ceramic might be considered indicated. This has the realize of saving valuable remaining tooth substance and eventually avoiding endodontic therapy.3.6 Dentin bandageingThere are recommendations in the literature for sealing the dentine with a Dentine Bonding Agent (DBA) following crown preparations in order to minimize the associated complications like hypersensitivity (Clinical Research Associates 1993). Dentine bonding agents have shown to be advantageous over the smear layer itself due to their mechanised retention (Nakabayashi et al. 1982) and moisture and acid resistance (Brunton et al. 2000). Over the blend in decades they have been considered as a modern way of sealing exposed dentine (Ferrari M. et al. 1999, Swift EJ et.al 2001).Some authors have compared the effectiveness of DBA with smear layer as a natural barrier. Pashley (1984) states that dentine permeability can be decrease up to 98% when smear layer is produced by slow or fast rotary headpieces but it would not last for more than a few days due to acidic PH from the oral cavity (Kerns DG. et al. 1991) .There are several advantages of DBAs over the smear layer like crisscross layer as described by Nakabayashi (1982) and resisting moisture and acid (Brunton et al. 2000).The result of various in-vitro studies on humans teeth (Pashley et al. 1992, White et al. 1992, Al-Fawaz et al. 1993) and animals teeth (Suzuki et al. 1994) supports the idea of seal ing the dentine of prepared teeth for a crown restoration. A literature review by Lam, C.W. and Wilson, P.R. (1999) revealed that dentine sealing with bonding agents prior to crown cementation could be beneficial due to fluid flow reduction in dentine tubules.Magne (2005) believes that immediate application of dentine bonding agents or Immediate Dentine Sealing (IDS) prior to impression taking can reduce the postoperative sensitivity and bacterial contamination. 35% H3PO4 is normally use to remove the smear layer before DBA application.There are unlike ways of sealing dentinal tubules after the preparation. Edward and swift (2009) reviewed several in vitro research studies on the immediate dentine sealing technique in a critical appraisal and came to following conclusions. First, immediate sealing of fresh dentin improves the resin adhesion and the bond effectiveness go out be affected by late application. Second, the IDS provide a mechanical barrier which minimises the postopera tive sensitivity, bacterial contamination and eventually the necessity of local anaesthesia. well-nigh Practitioners favor to use self-etch-adhesives. However, Magne et al. (2007) believe that a three-step, etch-and-rinse adhesive has shown to be more efficient. In order to avoid complications after the IDS, some clinical steps need to be taken. The appearance of an O2 - hinderory layer is not desirable and should be prevented by light-curing the dentine adhesive twice under a glycerine coating. This step avoids the reaction between inhibitory layer and impression material. The reaction between temporary crown and sealed tooth should also be prevented by applying a separating material.The influence of dentine on antimicrobial effect of ingredients added to one-step dentine sealants was assessed by Gondim et al. (2008) and revealed a reduced affectivity after polymerisation with UV light.3.7 temporal CrownsTemporary crowns are provisional restorations that are fitted on the teeth b etween preparation and fit appointment. They have various functions, mainly dentine protection and tooth movement prevention. Their role is often overlooked by practitioners (Wassel et al. 2002). Pre-formed crowns (plastic, metal) and self or light cured resins are usually used in the dental practices as convenient for temporary restorations.Many temporary crowns have poor-fitting margins establish on production procedure and material used. Some materials create a gap between the temporary and the prepared tooth due to polymerisation shrinkage (Robinson and Hovijitra, 1982)( Tjan et al. 1987).Cervical border of a temporary crown is the primary playing area to be reached by bacteria from the oral environment. Richardson et al. (1991) believe that dentine in the cervical margin shows higher permeability than dentine in other surfaces of the prepared tooth and that confirms the importance of good marginal adaptation of temporary crowns.A paper by Cagidiaco et al. (1996) considers the exposure of vital pulp tissue to bacterial contamination and irritants after dentine preparation in the base of a cavity, especially if temporary shows an unsatisfactory sealing. Exposed dentinal tubules after a crown preparation provide a way for transfer of substances between the pulpal tissue and periphery (Garberoglio and Brannstrom M. 1976). These tubules are judge to be sealed by cement. several(predicate) researchers (White et al. 1992, White et al. 1994, Lyons. et al, 1997, Baldissare. et al. 1998, Goldman et al. 1992) have found microleakage to be present after either permanent or temporary crown cementation.Literature review supports the evidence of benefit of immediate dentine bonding as a technique during temporisation of indirect provided restorations but reveals a lack of in vivo evidence. This fact supports the essential for this clinical study.Study design methodologyThe study design and methodology go out be presented in accordance with the CONSORT explanation for account on clinical discharges (Moher et al., 2010).4.1 Trial DesignThis bequeath be a randomised discoverled parallel two-armed trial-pragmatic group trial to take place over the duration of a six-year period. The study willing provide a 11 allocation ratio. One molar tooth will be at random elect per participant. The evaluation of the way out will take place at one year, three years and five years (Fig 1).4.1.1 Changes to trial designThe Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) will have access to the un-blinded data. The study protocol may be altered by DMC due to their recommendations.4.2 actorsParticipant extract will take place utilising new and existing patient population that attends the dental practice. Recruitment will be on a continuous basis until the required crooks of participants have been enrolled into the study (see section 5 for sample size calculation). This will condition the pragmatic nature of the trial as no proactive recruitment of patients from leafl et drops and publicizing will take place. A educate member of staff will administrate the consent dish out once a patient has been set as having an eligible tooth suitable for the study.4.2.1 Inclusion criteria for participantsHealthy adult patients between 18-58 years of ageProvide a written informed consent, check spoken and written English.Regular attenders (at least every six months) with a two-year recordRequire a full coverage of a Molar (Upper or Lower arch)With a crownSelected tooth must be periodontally healthy.Selected tooth must be vital and without any taradiddle of pulpitic symptoms within the last 12 months.Are able to attend follow-up appointments.In terms of periodontal status, the chosen teeth for study have to have a BPE less than three mm as per guidelines published by British Society of Periodontology (BSP). The teeth must be also radiographically free of any pre-operative pathological signs meaning intact pulp with no evidence of radio-opaque foreign mat erials in the pulp chamber and/or root canals(s) and no periradicular radiolucent area.4.2.2 Exclusion criteria for participantsIrregular attenders to dental practiceHistory of pulpitic symptoms in the last 12 monthsPatients participating in any other medical interrogation trialsNotable medical history change or pregnancy be periapical pathology (radiographically)Periodontal pockets more than three mmPulpal exposure or extending caries into the pulp chamberVulnerable adults or children4.3 Study location and settingsThe trial will take place in twenty dental practices based in the United Kingdom. General Dental Practitioners with more than five years experience and qualification in a post-graduate restorative dentistry will be recruited.4.4 WithdrawalsPatients may be disqualified if they experience medical complications or refuse to attend routine check-ups. A patient may also be withdrawn fromthe study if the tooth suffers from a trauma, requires extraction or develops pockets dee per than 3mm due to insufficient oral hygiene. Information on all patients, including the reason for the insularism will be collected and added to trial data report. Patients may also choose to withdraw from the study themselves.4.5 RandomisationInitial selection process will include all teeth that are suitable per patient.To confine allocation concealment and to deposit the occurrence of selection bias (Vickers A.J. 2006) a remote allocation officer in the central generates the allocation of teeth for either the intervention or control group. The participants initials, gender, date of birth and tooth government note will be submitted to a centre securely, where randomisation will occur within the patients to select the eligible tooth and to allocate the patient to the treatment or control group using a computer generated sequential number list. The trial will include only one allocated tooth per patient per control or treatment group. The indication of allocation will be sent t o the general dental practitioner in an envelope with the patients identification encrypt and the tooth number. The code for trial remains hidden until the clinical procedure to treat all eligible teeth is ready. At this time, it will be assailable by the operator but not revealed to the participants.The randomisation will be balanced to a 11 ratio for each provider in each practice. Simple randomisation is suitable to generate a balanced group. Balance between the groups at each location will be verified by the trial allocation operator regularly.4.6 service line judgingA baseline examination will be carried out by operators once the suitable patients have completed the consent procedure. The assessment will includePatients Identification, age and genderMedical and social historyDental historyExtra-oral examinationMusculoskeletal assessment, Soft tissue profile, TMJIntra-oral examinationOral Hygiene, periodontal assessment, soft tissue, occlusal analysis, vitality testing, Ridge mapping,Radiographic evaluation of tooth prior to preparationReason for Crown placement4.7 GDP provisionEach of the operators will attend a one-day training program on techniques. Clinical consensus will be ensured and standardised in a backchat with investigators in a separate session and will include a clinical protocol for the preparation of teeth for a full coverage with a crown, impression taking and temporisation. Additional clinical protocols will be prepared for immediate dentine sealing after preparation and for final cementation of the restoration. A clinical team member will be name as the independent observer to evaluate the compliance to the study criteria. every last(predicate) materials and Instruments used will be applied as per manufacturers instructions. The Crown system used in the study is Cercon ht (Dentsply) full Contour Zirconia. The high strength of zirconia-based ceramic restorations increases the indications for choice. They can be a near ideal choice f or restoring crowns, fixed partial dentures, and implants in aesthetic areas. Because of their high strength, zirconia-based ceramic restorations can be cemented with traditional cements or bonded with adhesive resin cements. Like gold, Cercon ht has a simple, clinical protocol, requiring conservative tooth reductions of as little as 0.5 to 1.0 mm. A distinction that is friendly to both patients dentition and dentists chair time. every clinical and laboratory techniques for teeth involved in the study are specified as per Dentsply protocol.4.8 InterventionA universal self-priming dental adhesive system (Prime Bond NT Dual cure, Dentsply) and a ternary cure resin cement (Calibra, Dentsply) will be used to bond the indirect restoration to the tooth. The literature supports the chosen material for this proposed study (Barnes et al., 2006).4.8.1 Intervention protocol for Immediate Dentine Sealing (IDS)The teeth will be sealed immediately after preparation with Prime Bond NT Dual Cu re (Dentsply). To avoid any bond contamination, retraction cord will be placed before dentine sealing. The protocol for dentine bonding is as manufacturers instructionsClean pertly instrumented dentine with water spray and air dry.It is recommended not to etch dentine to minimize the possibility of post-operative sensitivity.Place 1-2 drops of Prime Bond NT adhesive into a clean plastic mixing well. Place an equal number of drops of self Cure activator into the same mixing well. Mix Contents for 1-2 seconds with a clean, sassy brush tip.Immediately apply mixed adhesive/activator to thoroughly moneyed all the tooth surfaces. These surfaces should remain wet for 20 seconds and may necessitate additional application of mixed adhesive/activator.Remove excess solvent by gently drying with clean, dry air at least for 5 seconds. spring up should have a uniform glossy appearance.Cure mixed adhesive/activator for 10 seconds using a curing light. Check curing light for minimum curing o utput of at least 550mw/cm2 and a spectral output, including 470nm (peak absorption of the CQ photoinitiator).Control GroupExactly the same procedure will be used for the control group prior to final bonding of the Crown.4.8.2 Protocol for Impression takingStudy Group (IDS)In practice, freshly cut dentin is present only at the time of tooth preparation (before impression). Freshly cut dentin is the ideal substrate for dentin bonding. Most studies on Dentine Bonding Agents (DBA) bond strength use freshly prepared dentin (Magne 2005). There is a possibility for the oxygen quelling layer of filled resin of the dentine bonding agent to inhibit the setting of the impression material. The bonded teeth have to be cleaned with pumic and a surface prophylactic cup and washed with water and air dried before the impression (Magne and Nielsen, 2009b). Impressions will be taken with an A-silicone double-mix technique (Aquasil ultra, Dentsply) as per manufactures Instruction.Control Group (no sealing)Impressions will be taken as per study group without sealing the dentine with DSA.4.8.3 Protocol for temporisationStudy Group (IDS)A prefabricated light curable temporary Crown (Protemp Crown temporisation material, 3M ESPE) will be fitted on the prepared tooth standard temporary cements. The occlusion will be controlled and if necessary adjusted.Control groupA temporary crown will be fitted as above without any DBA application and after Impression taking as per clinical consensus guidelines.4.8.4 Protocol for final cementationStudy group (IDS) fitting prior to the luting procedures (when placing the final restoration), it is recommended to roughen the existing adhesive resin using a coarse diamond bur at low speed or by microsandblasting (Magne 2005). The tooth and the restoration will be treated as per manufacturers instructions, and the crown can be cemented with dual cure resin (Calibra, Dentsply).Control groupThe same procedure as for study group will be carried out exc ept the adhesive resin roughening step.4.9 OutcomesThe outcome measures will be assessed, and the CRF forms updated at baseline and at recall appointments of 1 year, 3 years and 5 years. Any relevant clinical accident between these multiplication affecting the trial tooth needs to be enter on CRF. Base-line findings and post-operative taken periapical (PA) of each trial tooth at one year and five years will be studied, assessed and recorded by two blind assessors. These precalibrated, independent observers will examine the radiographs and categorize the periapical status of the selected teeth according to a written set of criteria(Cheung et al. 2005) ( submit 1). Categories 1, 2 or 3 are deemed to be associated with a non-vital pulp. If there are any disagreement, a third assessor will be involved as an judge before a final score is reached.The protocol for Periapicals will get to the guidelines produced by the faculty of General Dental Practitioners (Pendlebury et al., 2004). A n Independent assessor will audit each practice participating in the study to ensure compliance with radiology regulations (IRMER).4.10 BlindingEvery effort will be made to prevent disclosure of the exact nature of the study aim and to which arm of the study the participants have been allocated. This will be specified to minimise assessment reactivity, which has been hypothesised by McCambridge and Strang (2005).The date collection statistician who assesses and calculates the outcome results will also be blinded to the individual patient allocation to limit detection bias. The operators will not be blinded but the allocation of whether the tooth is to be control or intervention will be secret until intervention procedure is to be carried out.4.11 Follow upAn important selection criterion to minimise drop-out is the eligibility of the patients to be regular attenders at the relevant dental practices. Patients lost to follow up will be recorded..Category shapeDescription0Intact pulpN o evidence of radiopaque foreign materialin pulp chamber and/or root canal(s),and no periradicular radiolucent area1Widening of the PDL poseWidening of the apical part of the periodontal ligament space, not exceeding two times the width of the lateral periodontal ligament space2Periapical radiolucencyRadiolucency in connection with the apical part of the root, the diameter exceeding two times the width of the lateral periodontal ligament space3Endodontically treatedtoothTooth with radiopaque material in pulp chamber (if discernible) and/or root canal(s)Table 1- Radiographic categorization of pulpal status (Cheung et al. 2005)4.12 SafetyThis study will not be utilising any investigational medicinal products it will therefore be classed as a non- Clinical Trial of an Investigative Medicinal Product trial (non-CMITP). All untoward incidents will be ill events rather than adverse reaction. The study is also compatible with Data Protection and Mental cogency Act. The treatment options being studied are non-life threatening on non-vulnerable adults with no risk of harm and no unknown or uncertain risks. A Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) will be appointed who makes recommendations, as required, to the chair of the Trial Steering Committee. This committee is responsible for ensuring that the intervention and control techniques will be carried out under the guidance provided by the EU directive for Good Clinical Practice.4.12.1 Assessment of SafetyThere are no expected unexpected adverse events since the intervention is used routinely in general dental practice. The using of etching gel has expected adverse events should it come into contact with the soft tissues (Material Safety Data airplane (MSDS) sheet). All other dental materials involved (Prime Bond NT Dual Cure, Calibra dual cure resin cement (Dentsply), Protemp Crown temporisation material, 3M ESPE) are fully pass within the medical devices regulations for use in dentistry in UK. All operators are experien ced dental practitioners having handled these materials routinely and will be trained in dealing with expected adverse reactions should the product inadvertently come into contact with pati