The Role Of Cocoa In Conflicts Politics Essay

The Role Of umber In Conflicts bafflemental science EssayA coarse deal of attention has been given to the timbre of resource abundance in the onset and duration of conflicts. It is difficult to testify that the sole abundance of a certain natural resource thr maven increase the take chances of conflict. Different studies emphasize that the mismanagement of resources actu notwithstandingy raises the risk of potential conflict.2Cote dIvoire, a resource-rich ground, certainly had the potential to be just some other African rustic in the claws of a resource- propel civil war. As one of the introductions leading producers of deep brown beans, the burnt umber trade undoubtedly played an strategic role in the coun savors conflict.3 chocolate was used to finance the war machine expenditures of two organisation and get up forces. However, little has been said ab step to the fore the role of drinking chocolate in onset of the conflict. Cocoa cannot be considered the only resource that contri justed to the conflict, but one must acknow conductge the importance of drinking chocolate. This is the case because it has been the backbone of Cote dIvoires saving for decades.The purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of resource arrangement in the onset of the conflict in Cote dIvoire. The analysis leave alone be establish on resource governance as transp arnt, efficient and fair storage allocation of revenues and non-harmful participatory implementation of policies including all relevant actors and affected communities.4This paper testament analyze the governance of the chocolate sector because this sector has been the virtually primal aspect of the rudes economy to date. It will begin with the post-colonial effect and the receive of professorship Felix Houphouet-Boigny, and then continue until the onset of the conflict in 2002. It was during this year that the unify rebel forces Forces Nouvelles (FN) managed to gain control of the umber -rich northern part of the country.The management of resources, or resource governance, cannot be explained scarcely via an analysis of a countrys economic policies. It is all- valuable(a) to examine both economic and governmental decision-making processes since the two are a good deal interconnected. This paper will explain the relationships mingled with the commonwealths economic and political decisions that, presently or indirectly, contributed to circumstances in which a conflict was more liable(predicate) to begin.II SHORT OVERVIEW OF THE CONFLICTA former French colonization located in West Africa, resource-rich Cote dIvoire was considered one of the most prosperous countries in the region. subsequently gaining independence from France in 1960, it was subsequently ruled for 33 historic period by an autocratic leader named Felix Houphouet-Boigny. chair person Houphouet-Boigny is often referred to as the stupefy of the nation. Although rich in various resources much (prenominal) as deep brown, drinking chocolate, timber, gold, diamonds, oil and gas, the halcyon years of prosperity during Houphouet-Boignys political relation were closely related to agricultural advances. To be more precise, the economic prosperity of the country was primarily re salaryable to the trade of commodities.Dependence on capital commodities export directly influenced Houphouet-Boignys political platform. The governances policy encouraged migration from neighboring countries (Burkina Faso, Mali, Liberia etc.) to cocoa rich regions. Over time, this drastically change the ethnic structure of the country. When piece marketplace commodity prices fell in the 1980s, the set up were intensely felt in both economic and governmental sectors. Social unrest triggered by the governments unpopular attempts to downsize the unsustainable verbalize apparatus at long last resulted in the introduction of a multi-party arrangement.The proponent struggle that occurred a vocation chairwoman Houphouet-Boignys death in 1993 planted the seed of the ethnic division in Cote dIvoire. Henri K. Bedie succeeded Houphouet-Boigny. Bedie and other politicians placed promontorys of identity at the forefront of the political agenda. During this period of economic decline and uncertainty, it was not difficult to manipulate call into questions of identity that concentrate on traces amongst local the local first-comers and the migrant late-comers.5The distinction among foreigners and locals was an important political tool for defining citizenship. When Bedie enacted the rude(a) electoral write in code in 1995, all foreigners lost their right to voting. The parvenu code alike required that the parents of any presidential candidate be citizens of Cote dIvoire. Similar practices of elimination occurred within military institutions. Although Bedie believed such tactics would minimize political opposition, it lastly resulted in a military coup. In 1999, Gener al Robert Guei came to power.Political force-out mutely became entrenched in Ivorian society. This occurred via a violent boycott of the 1995 elections, Gueis military coup and the military and civil unrest which preceded the 2000 presidential elections. When Laurent Gbagbo took over the presidency, he introduced a new program of identification that get ahead deepened the whirl mingled with locals and migrants.In September 2002, multiple army personnel staged an assay coup against President Gbagbo. This led to a de facto division of the country in which southern Cote dIvoire remained under the control of the government and the north was overtaken by rebel forces. French military forces called Licorne monitored a ceasefire-line, the zone de confience. Three rebel movements (Mouvement Patriotique de la Cote dIvoire (MPCI), Mouvement Populaire Ivoiren du Grand Ouest (MPIGO) and Mouvement pour la Justice et la Pix (MJP)) in the long run joined forces and became the Forces Nouvell es (FN).The Linas-Marcoussis Peace Agreement was signed in January 2003. As per the parameters of the agreement, all conflict parties committed themselves to forming a government of national unity. In the pastime years, both parties repeatedly obstructed various peace efforts following the Marcoussis Treaty.6After years of sporadic outbursts of violence, the March 2007 Ouagadougou Political Accord (OPA) was signed between president Gbagbo and FN leader Guillaume Soro. Soro was subsequently appointed Prime Minister. Implementation of the OPA has been truly slow. However, it provided an adequate level of security and made the November 2010 presidential elections possible.7Preliminary elections results showed that President Gbagbo had lost the elections to his rival, former Prime Minister Alassane Ouattara. The ruling party contested the results on charges of massive fraud in the northern territories of Cote dIvoire, which were controlled by the FN. multinational observers differe nce of opiniond these charges. The report of the results led to severe tension and violent incidents. To this date, the dis congeale over the election results in Cote dIvoire has not been settled.III RESOURCE constitution USE AND ABUSEPost-Colonial PeriodAlthough often considered the golden years of Cote dIvoire, Houphouet-Boignys post-colonial rule did contribute to the countrys conflict. An abundance of rural area used for cocoa cultivation triggered the make of the so-called resource curse. The resource curse thesis addresses footings why a resource-abundant country fails to use resources in a mode that would be economically beneficial. It refers not only to the socio-economic take aimment of the country, but to a fault to its governance and prospects for democracy.8The following chapter will analyze resource governance, economic development and the political decisions of Houphouet-Boignys government. It will demonstrate that these factors ultimately contributed to the ons et of the conflict.1.1. Economy, Politics and PoliciesCote dIvoire gained its independence from France in 1960. By 1978, it was already one of the worlds leading cocoa producers. Cocoa, or more by and large the agricultural sector, constituted the backbone of the countys economy. Agricultural growth was mostly overdue to the conversion of forest areas into cropped areas and a shift in takings from furthere stuffs to highly remunerative coffee and cocoa. Liberal immigration policies promoted by the government attracted a foreign workforce from neighboring countries. Rapid deforestation carried out by immigrant farmers later squeezeed agricultural capacities.1964 marked the establishment of an important governmental institution. Caisse de Stabilisation et de Soutien des Prix des Produits Agricoles (CAISTAB) commercialized the cocoa and coffee sectors and guaranteed a fixed price for farmers through an advance sale system. CAISTAB bought cocoa directly from farmers and then sold it on the world market. The differences between the world market prices for cocoa and the prices paid to farmers were fundamental. The management of public revenues from cocoa was far from transparent and enabled government officials to indulge into corrupt activities. However, CAISTAB did bring about government investment in economic infrastructure and other services of great importance to farmers.9In 1967, President Houphouet-Boigny issued a decree stating that the knowledge domain belonged to the person who cultivated it. This caused patronage relationships to form between the local knowledge baseowners and the migrants who came to work the land. It essentially meant that the new laborers could sell part of the crops they helped produce. These relationships were often regulated through unceremonious agreements between locals and migrants. However, some migrants gained land access on the grounds of a valid principle of entitlement to rights by virtue of invested labor (and n ot by virtue of descent), which was fostered by Houphouet-Boignys policies.10Migrants were also given the right to vote. The subsequent impact of this policy and its relation to the onset of the conflict will be discussed later in the paper.Cocoa prices move to rise on the world market during late 1970s and revenues further contributed to Cote dIvoires development. CAISTAB, a stabilizing factor, ensured good prices for the farmers and continued to stimulate cocoa production. Additionally, inclusive politics regarding migrant farmers lended political agree to the regime. The government was able to purchase social peace by ensuring that divers(prenominal) ethnic groups received a share of the revenues. However, macroeconomic imbalances had grown to unsustainable levels, and the country carried a budget deficit of approximately 10% GDP. This was primarily a result of debt servicing problems due to rapid build-up of external debt during the second one-half of the 1970s, as well as w asteful resource allocation.11Unsustainable development and governance were only possible due to soaring cocoa prices on the world market.It is important to prove the interplay between the socio-economic, political and institutional dimensions. Lack of enhancer regarding the distribution of revenues via CAISTAB and the nature and efficiency of infrastructural investments indicate the presence of politically motivated country activity in the economy. Most state investments were typical unobjectionable elephant projects12that did not contribute to the countrys boilers suit development.13Undoubtedly, there was too much government interference in economic activities. This resulted in the insufficient development of a strong, independent private sector vis-a-vis the government. Concurrently, Cote dIvoire endured widespread subversive activity and an absence seizure of government accountability due to an autocratic regime and a overleap of checks and balances.The Cocoa WarWhether o r not certain regime types are more susceptible to conflict than others is subject to debate. What is known is that the type and quality of political institutions that develop overtime within a country whitethorn determine how natural resources are managed.14The government failed to contribute to economic variegation or invest in infrastructure for cocoa processing. As the gear up recipient of vast amounts of external rent, Cote dIvoires government had no intention of changing its policies or cutting excessive public spending.Excessive state hinderance in the agricultural sector, dependence on cocoa export and an inefficient public sector all played a role in Cote dIvoires economic development when world market cocoa prices collapsed in the 1980s. The governments retort was the two year Cocoa War in which a government-imposed cocoa embargo sought to influence global prices. This plan backfired and only turn out beneficial to other cocoa-producing countries. When Cote dIvoire r eturned to the market, its share in world production was cut back to 20% and prices for farmers were halved.As the country hovered on the verge of bankruptcy, state expenditures were reduced. multinational financial institutions, such as the worldly concern Bank (WB) and International pecuniary Fund (IMF), intervened. Cote dIvoires government was dragd into downsizing its large civil service and introducing greater enhancer. CAISTABs powers were restricted and farm gate prices were cut by half. Succumbing to both pressure at home and abroad, the government introduced a multi-party system.Cote dIvoires high dependence on primary commodities export made it extremely vulnerable to external shocks. Furthermore, such vulnerability and dependence compounded the risk of potential conflict. The correlation between different economic characteristics such as dependence on primary commodity exports, low average incomes and slow growth played a role in increasing the risk of civil war.15Ne w Government, aging GovernanceAfter Houphouet-Boignys death and forced political reform that introduced a multi-party system, the political arena was primed for a power struggle. New political circumstances and the continued economic downturn only increased overall political and social instability in the country. The following chapter will stress the lack of political will to introduce new, effective measures and ease the governments bag on the cocoa trade. It will also illustrate the political function of identity.2.1. CAISTAB and its SuccessorsA scandal involving the embezzlement of 34.5 million USD in European uniting (EU) credits intended for health care projects caused the WB and IMF to liquidate CAISTAB.16This resulted in even greater pressure on Cote dIvoires government to liberalize the cocoa market. Although liberalization meant the discontinuation of guaranteed prices for farmers, it did not improve their wages. Following CAISTABs liquidation, new institutions to gover n the cocoa (and coffee) trade were formed. In barely a year, five new institutions came into existence. These included the Autorite de Regulation du Caf et du Cacao (ARCC), Bourse du Caf et Cacao (BCC), Fonds de Regulation et de Controle du Caf et Cacao (FRC), Fonds de Developpement et de progression des activites des Producteurs de Caf et de Cacao (FDPCC) and the Fonds de Garantie des Cooperatives Caf et Cacao (FGCCC). In enunciate to fund the rapidly multiplying cocoa institutions, the government introduced new levies on severally kilogram of exported cocoa. This had a direct impact on the farmers wages, as exporters simply transferred the cost of levies to the farmers. The reform of cocoa governing institutions only permitted diversion of cocoa revenue for private purposes and towards off-budget expenditure by the Government, particularly military spending.172.2 The uncertainty of IdentityPolitical opponents manipulated identity issues as a means of maintaining power. The d istinction between the first-comers, or autochtones, and the late-comers, or allogenes, became central to the ongoing power struggle. In 1995, President Bedie enacted a new electoral code that exempted foreigners from their right to vote and stipulated that the parents of any presidential candidate hold Ivorian nationality.18This meant that approximately 25% of the creation (mostly in cocoa rich regions) was deprived of its right to vote or run for president. Additionally, the parliament passed a new land law excluding non-Ivorian planters from acquiring land titles in principle (Art.1).19Due to the overall instability in the country, this law was never enforced. President Gbagbos contribution to the issue was the introduction of a new program of identification based on the concept of autochtony.20This new concept made it even more difficult for migrants to prove their small town of origin21, thus further contributing to the autochtone allogene distinction.The lack of positive ef fects of liberalization coupled with the continued mismanagement of cocoa revenues through state institutions contributed to overall economic decline. High unemployment rates in urban areas put more pressure on the areas where cocoa was cultivated, because many youth returned to their villages and seek to claim the land from migrants. Questions of ownership naturally arose. The 1967 decree stated that the land belonged to the person who cultivated it.22However, this principle now came into conflict with the principle of intergenerational justice, which guarantees the younger generation appropriate access to family land.23Onset of the ConflictThe politization of the identity question that ethnically divided the country was a result of a scramble for control of the countys vast resources. Continued poor resource governance further destabilized the economy. The following chapter will analyze the development of the discourse of grievance.3.1. The Discourse of injuryThe grievance hy pothesis suggests that part of a certain population, or a certain region of a country, may feel deprived of the benefits of resource-related income and indeed decide to fight.24In the case of Cote dIvoire, the fact that migrants were working the cocoa land turned out to be crucial. This is because the cocoa production sector was most affected by the governments suicidal economic strategies. Collier argues that rebel organizations develop a reason of grievance in order to function.25However, concerning Cote dIvoire, one may ascertain that the government actually fomented an objective sense of grievance among the migrants. This sense was then further exploited by the rebels.Collier argues that the former itself (i.e. the real or imagined grievance) is not the core determinant regarding whether or not a country will experience civil war.26What appears more important is the feasibility of predation which determines the risk of conflict.27Different studies of Cote dIvoire do not ex amine whether the cocoa trade was used to finance the onset of the conflict. These studies find evidence suggesting that the FN rebels lawlessly traded diamonds and gold in order to finance themselves. Cocoa has been identified only as a resource that contributed to the duration of the conflict. Still, cocoa was a substantial source of revenue for the FN rebels. As soon as the rebels managed to seize power over the northern part of the country, they began taxing cocoa. They introduced the so-called protection taxes for trigger off within the FN controlled zone. Additionally, all trucks were weighed and the additional tax per kilogram of cocoa had to be paid. This system later unquestionable into an official taxing body called Le Centrale.Collier argues that sense of grievance alone is not enough for a conflict to start. Rather, it is the feasibility of the rebellion that will determine whether a country will experience civil war.28In the case of Cote dIvoire, both of the factors w ere present. The ostracize effects of poor resource governance, along with a number of political and judicial decisions, created an objective sense of grievance among the migrant minority and excite this segment of the population to take up arms. Although the lootability of cocoa itself is debatable, the tax system imposed to collect revenues from the cocoa trade was very profitable.IV final stageIn Cote dIvoire, both resource governance and political decision-making processes had a portentous impact on the later onset of conflict in the country. This interplay resulted in circumstances that made conflict more likely.The post-colonial autocratic regime of Houphouet-Boigny led to a government apparatus with full economic control. The lack of transparency and government accountability resulted in populist redistribution policies. The expansion of cocoa production and favorable policies for migrants changed the ethnic structure of the country and played a significant role in the o nset of the conflict. Although favorable migrant policies might form been good for the countrys economy at one point, one other reason for their implementation was the fact that migrants were good soldiers and gave the government more legitimacy. Such policies were implement in a country with no antiauthoritarian institutions and under developed human rights mechanisms, which later made it possible for other political actors to maltreatment them. Mismanagement of cocoa revenues through CAISTAB made the country dependant on primary commodities export and therefore vulnerable to external shocks. The clumsy political and economic reforms that followed did not deliver the expected results and only paved the way for further instability.The manipulation of identities was the outcome of a power struggle due to the recently introduced multi-party system. Further mismanagement of resource revenues through new cocoa institutions, continued high public spending and forced liberalization of the market caused high unemployment rates and impoverished the population. One cannot say that the attempt to change the country and liberalize its economy was wrong, but one can question the way new rules were imposed. The country did not possess canonical classless mechanisms, an efficient system of control, or a satisfying level of transparency. The state was not ready to give up its piece of the cake from cocoa revenues and start playing fairly on the new liberal market. Ultimately, farmers had to pay the price.Growing unemployment rates, especially in urban areas, caused people to return to their villages and try to claim their land from migrant farmers. Unclear ownership of cocoa land impacted the developing identity issue by deepening the gap between the autochtones and allogenes. In addition to being deprived of some basic human rights, this raised the question of the access to cocoa land they considered their own. The farmers were also affected by the overall economic i nstability in the country and bore the weight of the governments reforms. Ultimately, the stage was set for the feeling of objective grievance to develop and serve as a motive for the onset of conflict.In the case of Cote dIvoire, the root causes29of the conflict were socio-economic development (dependence on primary commodities export, slow economic growth, high poverty rates, forced institutional reforms, liberalization of the market), state institutions (CAISTAB, new cocoa trade institutions), political processes (migrant policies, introduction of new democratic institutions, politization of the identity issue) and government accountability (lack of transparency resulting in high corruption levels, mismanagement of resource revenues). In order to understand the conflict in Cote dIvoire, it is important to analyze the interplay of all of these factors. These factors developed the sense of grievance and provided the motive that aggravated and triggered the conflict. The means and o pportunity for sustaining the conflict were provided through the lucrative taxation system imposed by the rebels.V BIBLIOGRAPHYBasedau, M., Ley, J., (2005). Conceptualizing the option Curse in Sub-Saharan Africa Affected Areas and Transmission Channels. In M. Basedau A. Mehler (Ed.),Resource Politics in Sub-Saharan Africa(pp. 9-24). Hamburg, Germany The Institute of African Affairs.Basedau, M., (2005). Resourse Politics in Sub-Saharan Africa beyond the Resource Curse Towards a Future Research Agenda. In M. Basedau A. Mehler (Ed.),Resource Politics in Sub-Saharan Africa(pp. 325-348). Hamburg, Germany The Institute of African Affairs.Central acquaintance Agency, (2011). Africa Cote d Ivoire. Retrieved January 24, 2011, from https//www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/iv.html.Collier, P., The World Bank, Development Research Group. (2000).Economic Causes of civilised Conflict and Their Implications for Policy. Washington, USA World Bank.Global Witness, (2007). Hot Chocolate How Cocoa Fuelled the Conflict in Cote dIvoire. London, UK Global Witness. Retrieved January 20, 2011, from http//www.globalwitness.org/library/hot-chocolate-how-cocoa-fuelled-conflict-c%C3%B4te-d%E2%80%99ivoire.International Cocoa Organization, (2001). yearbook Report for 2000/01. London, UK International Cocoa Organization. Retrieved January 20, 2011, from http//www.icco.org/pdf/An_report/anrep0001english.pdf.International Cocoa Organization, (2002). Annual Report for 2001/02. London, UK International Cocoa Organization. Retrieved January 20, 2011, from http//www.icco.org/pdf/An_report/anrep0102english.pdf.Ross, M. L., (2004a). What Do We Know About immanent Resources and Civil War?.Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 337-356.Ross, M. L. (2004b). How Do Natural Resources cultivate Civil War? Evidence from Thirteen Cases. International Organization, 58 (1), 35-67.Schure, J., Guesnet, L., Mller, M. (2010). Natural Resources in Cote dIvoire Fostering Crisis or Peace? The Cocoa, Diamond, Gold and rock oil Sector. Bonn, Germany Bonn International Center for Conversion.The World Bank, Occidental and Central Africa Department. (1994).Republic of Cote dIvoire topic Agricultural Services Support Project (No. 12388 IVC). Washington, USA World Bank.The World Bank, (2011). Data. Retrieved January 27, 2011, from http//data.worldbank.org/country/cote-divoire?display=graph.